Any companies using the old SRD?

[maddman75]

Sweet. To me that means Malhavoc is one of the first places I'll look for product. Wait, no change there...

And I for one am certainly not one who doesn't buy books. I was hyped for the revision, until I looked at the SRD. Too many changes for no appearant reason IMO. Not that it's bad, just not good enough for me to convert. Looking at it like any other RPG purchase, not worth it.

And like I said, it isn't too big a deal to convert. Just annoying - stat blocks will be off, spell selection will be off, skills and feats renamed. It's not like I won't buy a book that isn't 3.0 or dual statted. Just that if one is, I'll look at it much more seriously.

 

[Daniel A. Walls]

I believe AEG's Swashbuckling Adventures is staying 3.0

Dan

 

[Numion]

That is incorrect. Once material is open, you can use it indefinitely. They can use the 3.0 SRD, 3.5 SRD, mix the two, or whatever.

What was the point in removing certain monsters from the SRD then, like Mind Flayers and Beholders?

 

[gariig]

What was the point in removing certain monsters from the SRD then, like Mind Flayers and Beholders?

What happened with that is...Wizard's released them prematurely under the "Gentleman's Agreement" which meant they could be used before their official release to the SRD. However, when they were officially released at the beginning of the year certain iconic monsters of Wizard's wasn't there (Illithid, Yun-ti, etc). This has nothing to do with 3.0 VS 3.5 because neither official SRD has them in it.

Gariig

 

[jmucchiello]

I'm finishing up a mini-adventure at the moment and am considering picking the main bad guy's spells in both 3.5 and 3.0 but then I'd have to write two sets of tactice, may change a feat or two. I'm not sure I want to go through all that extra work. Especially since I'm not going to do it for a some low-level spellcasters elsewhere in the adventure. I'm still on the fence. As a PDF it's a problem of time and testing rather than a problem of space.