Anyway too upgrade the...

[kreynolds]

What about:

Decisive Strike

Prerequisites: Proficient with weapon, weapon focus (with chosen weapon), Weapon Specialization (with chosen weapon), Improved Critical (with chosen weapon), base attack bonus 10 or 12

Umm...aside from the name of the feat...that's a blatant ripoff of mine. Well, except for the Weapon Specialization, but I wouldn't restrict this feat to fighters.

 

[Valicor]

Umm...aside from the name of the feat...that's a blatant ripoff of mine. Well, except for the Weapon Specialization, but I wouldn't restrict this feat to fighters.

Your makig my head hurt again.
*Steals is feat back* Mine!!

 

[GralTok]

;P ok add the power attack as you said remove the weapon specialization so non fighter can use it and put it 10 so fighter can get it before others... what ya think?

 

[Valicor]

Specialization may be an unnessacary restriction, I agree with the False Sean. And definetaly +12

 

[kreynolds]

Your makig my head hurt again.
*Steals is feat back* Mine!!

Hehe. Weapon Focus was the big factor in my draft of the feat. Ironically enough, that's a feat that has been sitting in a Work doc of mine for over 2 months.

I kept in mind the concept of Feat Chains. To get Whirlwind Attack, you need to have a boatload of feats. But you don't need Weapon Specialization, which means it isn't restricted to Fighters. BIG OL' STRIKE TO THE FACE wouldn't be any more powerful than Whirlwind attack, so it probably shouldn't be restricted to fighters either.

 

[kreynolds]

Specialization may be an unnessacary restriction, I agree with the False Sean. And definetaly +12

Once again...Damn I'm good.

Note: Please leave it alone and allow me my false moment of bloated ego.

 

[Valicor]

Weapon Focus was the big factor in my draft of the feat. Ironically enough, that's a feat that has been sitting in a Work doc of mine for over 2 months.

I kept in mind the concept of Feat Chains. To get Whirlwind Attack, you need to have a boatload of feats. But you don't need Weapon Specialization, which means it isn't restricted to Fighters. BIG OL' STRIKE TO THE FACE wouldn't be any more powerful than Whirlwind attack, so it probably shouldn't be restricted to fighters either.

heh so other then the power attack, part you come to the same ocnclusion as me then on the feat?
Are our thoughts as one on the subject? if so let us finalize it wth an agrement that the feat s good as is.

 

[GralTok]

Well .. ok so now we need to decide the Base Attack Bonus ... what we do...

10 12 15....




for me not 15... too high

 

[Valicor]

Once again...Damn I'm good.

Note: Please leave it alone and allow me my false moment of bloated ego.

fair enough :-D

 

[kreynolds]

heh so other then the power attack, part you come to the same ocnclusion as me then on the feat?
Are our thoughts as one on the subject? if so let us finalize it wth an agrement that the feat s good as is.

Val, I came to that conclusion long ago. Also, remember that it's been sitting on my comp for quite a while, along with a bunch of other feats, dozens of spells, a whole load of magic items.

By the way, do you realize that you and I post rapidly enough to just about have a real-time discussion? Quite refreshing, actually.