Re: People being insulted by the 4Ed ad campaign.
Its kind of like a verbal/linguistic version of mechanical resonance.
Each individual negative statement may have been minimally perturbing, but as each new one popped up, it reinforced the perturbations generated by previous statements.
Statement A gets me interested in the game.
Statement B gets me mildly miffed at a certain aspect of what has been revealed.
Statement C gets me a little annoyed at another aspect of the forthcoming design, but also makes me more negative at B.
Statement D is neutral.
Statement E is negative, and while mildly so, it amplifies my negative perceptions of statements C and B.
By the time statements X, Y, and Z rolls around (whatever their nature), the rhetorical oscillations caused by negative statements have reached a certain magnitude that renders the positives of the game almost...secondary.
All in all, we really don't need to recount each and every particular phrase or statement that annoyed us about the 4Ed rollout- we'll only annoy ourselves needlessly, and no matter how many we recount, we won't convince anyone that our perceptions were valid.
We saw things differently then, and we still do today. Let the details of the squabble rest.