It was...but I think its interesting that the change to Balor was actually something mythological on its own. Sure, it doesn't fit the creature perfectly, but still. It almost seems to me that its become Balor-->Balrog(Tolkien)-->Balrog(D&D)-Balor(D&D). Just interesting to me, really.Chimera said:I thought this was a "Tolkein Estate" deal. Can't call them Balrogs, call them something else. Can't use the name "hobbit", call them something else. Can't call them Ents, etcetera, etcetera.
In OD&D, perhaps, but there were plenty of Balrogs in Tokien's world. The Silmarillion even mentions someone named Glorfindel (although not apparently the same one from LotR) who single-handedly defeated more than one (albeit not all at once). Durin's Bane (the Balrog of LotR) was one of the Balrogs that escaped the end of the second age.diaglo said:Balrog.... singular ... again there was only 1.
UltimaGabe said:If I'm not mistaken, didn't Tolkien get his ideas from D&D, not the other way around?
UltimaGabe said:If I'm not mistaken, didn't Tolkien get his ideas from D&D, not the other way around?
diaglo said:in OD&D there was only 1.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.