If Rob Neyer's Pythagorean standings (which calculate the expected record of a team based on runs scored vs. runs allowed; one-run games are largely decided by luck) are meaningful, the Cubs basically won their division because they were lucky (winning two games more than they should have), the Astros were very unlucky (losing eight more games than they should have), and the Cars were unlucky (losing five more games than they should have). So I wouldn't count on a Cubs dynasty.Kid Charlemagne said:Dusty rode them into October, and they dropped like flies a series and a half too soon. Cubs fans just have to hope that they're only tuckered out, not injured. My personal projection is that the big three will pitch fewer innings next year, with a worse ERA. This is a team that could be great for years, but this offseason, and the bounce-back of their three young guns will determine if 2003 was a one-shot deal, or the beginning of an Atlanta Braves kind of run.
Dorthgery, if you have the time could you tell me what the KC Royals record should have been? Just really curious to see how many games Pena stole from the competition.drothgery said:If Rob Neyer's Pythagorean standings (which calculate the expected record of a team based on runs scored vs. runs allowed; one-run games are largely decided by luck) are meaningful,
I hate being right... *sigh*Brother Shatterstone said:Well the Sox just jumped out to a 3-0 lead, but I've had this feeling all day that Wakefield, coming into the game in relief, is going to be the keystone for the Red Sox tonight.
Tarrasque Wrangler said:God is a New Yorker, apparently.