Best of the Best - Strikers.

Which of these is the best striker?

  • Ranger - Archer

    Votes: 46 22.0%
  • Ranger - Two-blade

    Votes: 35 16.7%
  • Ranger - Beastmaster

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Rogue - Artful

    Votes: 15 7.2%
  • Rogue - Brutal

    Votes: 17 8.1%
  • Rogue - Ruthless

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Warlock - Dark

    Votes: 4 1.9%
  • Warlock - Fey

    Votes: 3 1.4%
  • Warlock - Star

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Warlock - Infernal

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Warlock - Vestige

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Avenger - Isolating

    Votes: 4 1.9%
  • Avenger - Pursuing

    Votes: 10 4.8%
  • Avenger - Commanding

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Barbarian - Rageblood

    Votes: 18 8.6%
  • Barbarian - Thaneborn

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Sorcerer - Cosmic

    Votes: 3 1.4%
  • Sorcerer - Dragon

    Votes: 11 5.3%
  • Sorcerer - Storm

    Votes: 13 6.2%
  • Sorcerer - Wild

    Votes: 19 9.1%
  • Monk - Centered

    Votes: 3 1.4%

Perhaps you aren't taking enough risks as an artful dodger then. With mine, it's running into the fray and attacking from the middle of all the bad guys, and zipping back out. Almost never missing and hardly ever getting hit thanks to increased AC against opportunity attacks or powers that let him shift 5 squares, etc. In true glass cannon fashion, he's hits often but unless he's moving he get hit... hard.
Wow, I haven't played in months!

Past first round, it was hard to find good flanking positions that didn't involve spending an entire round just moving (most of the campaign was outdoors). I had no real "flank buddy" (the PCs were more "individuals" than "party").

In the meantime, the archer ranger remained rooted to a spot and took down creature after creature with her bow.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Remove ads

Top