Psion said:I think the THG people are being a bit sensitive. Yes Forrester is making a mountain out of a Molehill. But c'mon, this is Forrester, Mr. "make a mock lecture about the 50 piddly gaming conventions that make me whine." I wouldn't get too bent out of shape.
Flattering that you can't seem to get my lectures out of your mind, Psyaen! You elf-sympathizer you. Hmmm. Mayyybe you're on their *payroll*! Are you folks planning on hiring him?

Anniversary of the lectures is coming up, by the way.
And die_kluge, I never "blasted" Bluffside. In sum, I said that Neatness Counts. I picked on Mongoose more than I picked on you guys . . . and my original propositions remain the same:
1) If I'm going to pay 20 bucks for something, I want to see the "good content" professionally produced.
2) The more errors in your product, the less you seem like a company to be trusted and the more you seem like a bunch of fanboys with Pagemaker. An exaggeration, but you get my point.
NOT that I know that there's even ONE error in your product! #1 and #2 are a general statement to the d20 community in general, and not targeted at you. But yeah, obvious misspellings on your company website suggest that your ship isn't run quite as tight as it needs to be

But I'm sorry if you (or anyone else reading this thread) interpreted my post as an attack.
(Unless you're Mongoose Matt. C'mon, guy! Shape up!)
(PS -- Psion -- look what I found in your review of Mongoose's Necromancy:
"No exception to this trend is a template for recreating a classic creature from old editions of the D "& amp";D "
All the ampersands are screwed up. Tsk tsk. On the other hand, your reviews are free

I suppose it could be a browser thing . . . oddly, when I cut 'n pasted it into here, it read perfectly.)
Last edited: