Wolfen Priest said:I have.
Go to amazon.com, they have the front cover available for viewership. And yes, it looks like it's bound (mock-style, of course) in human flesh.
Here it is:
![]()
ForceUser said:Actually, I think it would be kind of cool if BoVD was so graphic that we couldn't talk about it here for fear of upsetting Eric's Grandmother.
Hakkenshi said:And I REALLY don't expect to see ritual sex described in this book.
Olive said:
but see, that would be useful in a game context. so i'd be keen for that...
Psion said:
If you dig around, there's a facsimile of the front cover floating around somewhere. It's nothin' special. R&R is worse...
Ristamar said:I think that topic, at least in the context of RPG's, is viewed by most as more of a (crude) joke than anything else, myself included. Sometimes I peruse the [Adult] GtUCK thread for an occasional chuckle.
Originally posted by Balsamic Dragon:
I simply don't want to see rules for prostitution or any sort of ritual sex for D&D. It's gratuitous and drives would-be gamers away from the hobby. We had the wandering hooker subtable in the first edition DMG and that was quite enough thanks!
Olive said:
well, given that, like human sacrifice, its a major part of ocult lore, i think its appropriate. in fact maybe the only appropriate use of sex in my games...