D Diirk First Post May 12, 2005 #11 I don't think redundant is the word you're looking for... clearly they aren't redundant, as they stack with each other. For them to be redundant, it would mean that one was unnecessary to grant the same effect, which isn't the case.
I don't think redundant is the word you're looking for... clearly they aren't redundant, as they stack with each other. For them to be redundant, it would mean that one was unnecessary to grant the same effect, which isn't the case.
