Arbiter of Wyrms
First Post
3.5 allows Druids to use weapons outside the class decription without violating their oath, but the Druid weapons list doesn't include the bow.
The druid's only ranged weapon is the sling.
My presumption is that the druid concept only includes "primitive" weapons. I understand that the sling is more primitive than the bow, but I would also argue that the bow (non-composite) is more pirmative than the scimitar.
My wife is complaining that her new druid PC won't be proficient with the bow without blowing a feat on it, and since I can't really see why the bow should be prohibited to druids based on concept alone, I will probably house-rule the druid class to include proficiency with bows.
Note: I like game balance, but it is not the paramount concern in my game.
The druid's only ranged weapon is the sling.
My presumption is that the druid concept only includes "primitive" weapons. I understand that the sling is more primitive than the bow, but I would also argue that the bow (non-composite) is more pirmative than the scimitar.
My wife is complaining that her new druid PC won't be proficient with the bow without blowing a feat on it, and since I can't really see why the bow should be prohibited to druids based on concept alone, I will probably house-rule the druid class to include proficiency with bows.
What problems, if any, do all foresee with allowing druids to use bows?
Note: I like game balance, but it is not the paramount concern in my game.
Last edited: