Can a monk take Improved Natural Attack?: The Poll!
- Thread starter TheEvil
- Start date
- Status
Kurotowa
Legend
Scion said:
You could, if you wanted to egregiously mutilate my entire meaning. I said 'entire class' and I MEANT 'entire class'. As in, 'all Druids' or 'all Monks'. Natural Spell is almost a requirement for all Druids who don't want to sacrifice significant power. If allowed, INA would be a requirement for all Monks who don't want to sacrifice significant power. Well, outside of a multiclass dip or some odd build focused on Stunning Fist that doesn't care how much damage it does. INA will become a required feat for all Monks because there are no downsides and such a major upside. It would be like offering a feat that gives a caster class an additional spell slot for each spell level they have access to. You would be crazy not to take it.
Well, then I disagree. I have seen plenty of monks not take ina (too many other feats that they want) and I have seen about half of the druids in games I have been in and run not take natural spell (same/similar reasoning).
Ina isnt any better than a fighter type taking exotic weapon prof for some more potent weapon and not all of them do that.
Natural spell is great for druids who want to cast a lot of spells in animal form (apparently instead of buffing before hand or actually attacking with their new form).
It comes down to playstyle and what choices the players make. Maybe the druid would be much better with ina himself along with multiweapon fighting and didnt have the feats to spend on natural spell. Maybe the monk wanted to focus on a half dozen other good feats. Who knows.
Also, not every mage is a specialist. So apparently not all will take that extra spell of each level castable either if it is offered. But then that sort of thing woulnt work as a single feat. There is already a single feat which gives one extra spell slot per day.
Ina isnt any better than a fighter type taking exotic weapon prof for some more potent weapon and not all of them do that.
Natural spell is great for druids who want to cast a lot of spells in animal form (apparently instead of buffing before hand or actually attacking with their new form).
It comes down to playstyle and what choices the players make. Maybe the druid would be much better with ina himself along with multiweapon fighting and didnt have the feats to spend on natural spell. Maybe the monk wanted to focus on a half dozen other good feats. Who knows.
Also, not every mage is a specialist. So apparently not all will take that extra spell of each level castable either if it is offered. But then that sort of thing woulnt work as a single feat. There is already a single feat which gives one extra spell slot per day.
- Status
Similar Threads
D&D 3E/3.5
Homebrew Content
