BreakAWindow said:Blah, blah, blah. (Paraphrase by Dinkeldog.)
BreakAWindow said:Their ideas of fairness seem to be "warn once, then perhaps twice, and if the person still expresses inconvenient or uncomfortably unpleasant opinions, ban him."
And quite a few number of people consider this to be "solving a problem". Mostly because they've been heavily selected for.
And no one complains because you want to remain here! You're not willing to risk access to EN World by stating what they're doing is wrong -- you're not even willing to look for the problems, because that would make it too hard to stay.
If you invite someone in, violate the terms under which you invited them, what makes you think that you can then complain about their not honoring those terms?
BreakAWindow said:Blah, blah, blah
BreakAWindow said:Define "disruptive". Disruptive to what? To whom?
They define 'disruptive' as they like, without regard for the standards they imposed.
That's forbidden. Public complaints aren't permitted, and the people I've contacted have no interest in discussing it either. I doubt you're honestly concerned, yourself... although I admit I could be wrong.
Anyone arriving here is invited to join the community, as long as they follow the rules. Unless they follow the rules but the mods feel like doing what they like, of course... then they're subject to editing, deletion or banning.