Casting on the Defensive and Spell Loss?

Nifelhein

First Post
Okay I was reading the 3.5 SRD and saw that my group may be using Castin on the Defensive in a wrong manner, by what I understood if you fail the concentration check to cast on the defensive you loose your spell, is this right?

I am asking because we have always used the rule in a way that if you fail the concentration check you would then be subject to AoO, which would call for a concentration check that could result in loss of the spell, but not necessarily.

I want to know if Casting on the Defensive means loss of spell if you fail, if it was like this on 3.0 or if it a 3.5 addition.

Thanks guys, I am gonna start a campaign soon and am re-reading the rules so I am up to date with them.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

3.0 Was if you fail your Casting on the Defensive roll, you lost the spell but did not suffer an AoO.

3.5 seems to be the same:

Casting Defensively: If you want to cast a spell without provoking any attacks of opportunity, you must make a Concentration check (DC 15 + the level of the spell you’re casting) to succeed. You lose the spell if you fail.

Slim
 

Magic Slim said:
3.0 Was if you fail your Casting on the Defensive roll, you lost the spell but did not suffer an AoO.

3.5 seems to be the same:

Yeah I thought so, that part of the rule I missed the very first time I read the books just when they were released, too many changes to be sure about everything then.

Thanks!
 

Nifelhein said:
Okay I was reading the 3.5 SRD and saw that my group may be using Castin on the Defensive in a wrong manner, by what I understood if you fail the concentration check to cast on the defensive you loose your spell, is this right?

Sounds like you now understand it -- it's been that way in both 3.0 and 3.5.

Obligatory grammar note: In English the proper word is "lose your spell". The word "loose" means something different (it's an adjective, not a verb).
 

dcollins said:
The word "loose" means something different (it's an adjective, not a verb).

It's an adjective and a verb. And also an adverb and a noun.

But you're right in that he was using it incorrectly - its common use as a verb is "to set free".

-Hyp.
 

Hey thanks! I didn't even noticed I wrote it that way and that shows how your absence of practice can trick you.

Edit: better get some sleep, I am writing even worse now...
 
Last edited:

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top