Celestial Codex Series?

[Klaus]

As cool as that would be -- and is, since 3rd party publishers have done stuff like that -- I just can't see WotC creating a book for people who want to roleplay angels.

Who said anything about roleplaying angels? This is D&D! A book like this would be about killing [Evil] and taking its stuff!

 

[Michael Silverbane]

Well. I, for one, am buying it whether it comes out or not. Beat that!

Later
silver

 

[Agamon]

I'm undecided. Just as I am about the Fiendish Codexes.

Olgar has a good point, though. I look at my DDM minis the same way. I want all the evil outsiders, but I tend to not keep the good ones (even though some of them look amazing). I just don't think I'll use them very much.

 

[Fat Daddy]

Yep. I love monster books...or fiend books...or celestial books. Bring 'em on!!!

 

[Pants]

I voted 'no.'

Celestials, in general, bore me, unless something really cool is done with them. And I don't see that happening...

 

[Ogrork the Mighty]

Would I buy it? Maybe. Would it sell well? I doubt it.

 

[hong]

There's a lot of people saying no but a lot of people voting yes....

 

[BOZ]

your mouth says no, but your eyes say yes!

 

[Pants]

your mouth says no, but your eyes say yes!

That's my eyes closing as I slowly drift off to sleep.

 

[Li Shenron]

I voted "no" because the ratio of usefulness of celestials vs fiends is probably close to 1/100.

That doesn't mean I wouldn't actually buy it anyway after all, but I think that most of us probably would do so just to get the feeling that at least celestials exist...