Pielorinho
Iron Fist of Pelor
Spider said:
Except that the item specifically says that it allows you to turn undead:
Very clever! And this is where D&D descends into lawyering. I'd say that the important part of that phrase is the "as if she were four levels higher than her actual class level": the part about "allows her to turn undead" is irrelevant without the adverbial dependent clause.
Why? Because a cleric or paladin ALREADY can turn undead. The amulet doesn't allow her to do it. All it allows her to do is to turn them at a higher level.
Not that I want to get into a second-amendment discussion here, but it's similar to the argument that the second amendment must be read as a piece, that separating out the independent clause in the second amendment changes its meaning. Whether or not you agree with that (and please don't tell me whether or not you do), in this case, I believe you have to read independent and dependent clauses together. To do otherwise changes the sentence's meaning.
Daniel