Every so often, I've seen Chess given as an example of a classic boardgame that counts squares and diagonals as the same distance.
I'm sorry - it doesn't. It just doesn't care about distance.
Here are the pieces:
PAWN - one square movement forward, or take on square forward diagonal.
ROOK - any number of squares forward or sideways
KNIGHT - one squares orthogonally, one diagonal. jumps
BISHOP - any number of squares diagonally
KING - one square orthogonally or diagonally
QUEEN - any number of squares diagonally or orthogonally.
All pieces either move a set number of squares (that can't be changed) or have "unlimited" movement within the confines of the board.
At no point do you need to count the distance a piece moves because it might go outside its range. The Queen isn't a "5 square" movement piece.
Cheers!
I'm sorry - it doesn't. It just doesn't care about distance.
Here are the pieces:
PAWN - one square movement forward, or take on square forward diagonal.
ROOK - any number of squares forward or sideways
KNIGHT - one squares orthogonally, one diagonal. jumps
BISHOP - any number of squares diagonally
KING - one square orthogonally or diagonally
QUEEN - any number of squares diagonally or orthogonally.
All pieces either move a set number of squares (that can't be changed) or have "unlimited" movement within the confines of the board.
At no point do you need to count the distance a piece moves because it might go outside its range. The Queen isn't a "5 square" movement piece.
Cheers!