see
Pedantic Grognard
And I stand by it. The rationales for this setting change – explain the rules changes, reduce the number of gods – are the same rationales given for the Avatar Crisis. The mechanism – Mystra and a bunch of other deities get killed – is the same. The out-of-character actions are a repeat, too – Tyr and Helm dueling over Tymora is as stupid as Storm Silverhand trying to get Midnight and Adon hanged without evidence.catsclaw227 said:There is a quote in this thread that says :the designers, have no better idea about how to handle an edition change than to repeat the Avatar Crisis, only bigger:
As far as the record of the design team, well, I don't doubt their goodwill, or their love, or their mechanics ability, only their storytelling competence. And my doubts are not based on just what we've heard recently about 4e, but the last ten years or so of "development" of the setting. For example, in Chris Perkin's entry, I see a promise that they aren't going to destroy Cormyr. I'm wondering how; did Hasbro invent a time machine that will let them go back and stop Death of the Dragon from being published?
So, you know, I'm already one of those people who isn't going stick with 3.x FR products, because I'm already busy sticking with 1e and early 2e FR products. I bought the 3e FRCS, full of hope that with the new edition they'd euthanize the progression of RSEs; I was disappointed. I don't have hopee this time.