D&D General Chris Perkins and Jeremy Crawford Join Darrington Press

Both departed Dungeons & Dragons earlier this year.
IMG_7357.webp


Chris Perkins and Jeremy Crawford have a new home, joining Critical Role’s Darrington Press. The LA Times was the first to report on the news of the pair joining Darrington in undisclosed roles. [UPDATE: Per Darrington Press, Perkins is Creative Director and Crawford is Game Director, matching their roles at Wizards.] According to the article, Perkins and Crawford were approached by Critical Role shortly after news broke that the pair were departing Wizards of the Coast.

I was committed to staying with Wizards until after D&D’s 50th anniversary, which gave me lots of time to work on succession planning and exit strategies,” Perkins told the LA Times. “What brought me out of retirement was the chance to work with Jeremy and the brilliant folks at Critical Role on things that have a lasting, positive impact on the world.”

“Chris and I talked about his retirement plan for years, so his approaching departure was long on my mind. When we sent the new D&D rule books to the printer last year, I felt it was time to explore a new chapter for myself,” Crawford added. “I love the game and its team, but 18 years is a long time. I was ready for a new adventure. The chapter that we’ve now opened feels like coming home — resuming work with Chris and returning to Southern California.”

Darrington Press just launched Daggerheart, a fantasy TTRPG that’s more narrative focused than D&D, but also has significant rules-crunch. Many have described Daggerheart as a rival to D&D, a comparison that will likely be made even more now that Darrington has snatched away two of D&D’s primary architects for the last 10+ years.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer


log in or register to remove this ad



Nine?!? Are some of your family Chumash, or harbor seals?
My Spanish family has been there since the mission was being built, so nine generations is just them, not counting the (sadly) unknown Chumash predecessors.

It only takes like 160-200 years to hit nine generations, depending on the age of mothers at time of childbirth. I don’t keep the records, that’s my aunt, but yes, nine generations. No seals.
 



I usually use 20 years per gen as a rough average when thinking about such things. You could use 30, but I highly doubt the average person is born to a 30 year old mother lol
Historically, cross culturally, the average age of marriage for women tended to be mid-20s. Teen marriages have mostly been abnormal or political, not the average experience.

The Baby Boomers were the weird exception, starting families way younger on average than the historical norm.

But 20-30 years is a pretty fair rule of thumb (5 generations gets me from the mid-80s to the Civil War).
 

Historically, cross culturally, the average age of marriage for women tended to be mid-20s. Teen marriages have mostly been abnormal or political, not the average experience.

The Baby Boomers were the weird exception, starting families way younger on average than the historical norm.

But 20-30 years is a pretty fair rule of thumb (5 generations gets me from the mid-80s to the Civil War).
In my family history, 18-23 is more common than 30 by a wide margin.

But either way, we have the records, it’s not like it’s guesswork here. I brought up the math to show that nine generations in a bit over 200 years isn’t weird at all.
 


In my family history, 18-23 is more common than 30 by a wide margin.

But either way, we have the records, it’s not like it’s guesswork here. I brought up the math to show that nine generations in a bit over 200 years isn’t weird at all.
Nope, not weird at all: pretty impressive flex for a Californian, though.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Related Articles

Remove ads

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top