moritheil
First Post
frankthedm said:I wish this did not sound so damn on the money.
Alas

But back to the topic . . . isn't it a little illogical to say that making no money is better than making less money due to piracy?
frankthedm said:I wish this did not sound so damn on the money.
Sitara said:Please note that while rpg's may not make all that much money if you factor in printing costs and all, DnD is the exception. And its an exception with a HUGE margin.
DnD is not just the market leader of rpg's, its the leader by (again!) a HUGE margin. With 4e, that is probably just going to grow, especially as one of its biggest competitors (wfrp v2) is gone.
Unfortunately, I think Hussar has the right of it. I have been a fan of several of GW's "other games" for a long time now (anyone remember their Warlock card game?) The cycle is: produce a core book and a small amount of supplements, then allow the game to languish ... until you eventually reprint a new edition or just drop it altogether.Hussar said:Personally, I like Fear the Boot's podcast take on GW. Paraphrasing a bit, but, it basically comes out to, "If fans like it, GW will kick them inna fork".![]()
Star Wars minis sell well to two main groups, collectors and those who play the minis game (with a large part of the second group also being in the first).Son_of_Thunder said:It's got me thinking if WotC is going to go this way too? I've read several times that the Star Wars minis were a huge cash cow that that was why no rpg products were being released. Will we see D&D head this way with more minis being produced and all the rulebooks having mini game stats (Here's how to use this in you mini game section)?
I believe there were areas where this was the case. I know the WFRP was a lot closer to D&D in the UK at one point. In the US I don't believe it was ever any higher than a low second tier RPG.SSquirrel said:No offense, but on what planet was WFRP ever a big competitor of D&D? The mini game sure, but the RPG has always been a distant afterthought of all the gamers I've ever known. Personal anecdotes rock heh.
SteveC said:Unfortunately, I think Hussar has the right of it. I have been a fan of several of GW's "other games" for a long time now (anyone remember their Warlock card game?) The cycle is: produce a core book and a small amount of supplements, then allow the game to languish ... until you eventually reprint a new edition or just drop it altogether.
GW is a strange beast: they have many successful products that just aren't successful enough for them. It makes me sad because I was looking forward to being a GW customer (or sorts) again. Sadly, won't happen. But anyone who has bought into any of the lines other than the core in the last 10-15 years should hardly be surprised by this.
--Steve