Classes ... Much Less Flexible than Advertised

[Crashy75]

I seemed angry? Must be the avatar. I assume they are not being deceptive and m/c is more than just a feat. EDIT: I see. I should have said, "... would be deceptive."

 

[Mustrum_Ridcully]

I seemed angry? Must be the avatar. I assume they are not being deceptive and m/c is more than just a feat. EDIT: I see. I should have said, "... would be deceptive."

What a luck I didn't waste a precious feat slot on Angry Posting then.

But what other name should they give it? It is the 4E implementation of "having abilities of other classes", which was previously called dual/multi-classing.

And I think the implementation makes a lot of sense - if most class abilities are now packaged in powers, you really don't need much else besides taking a feat and getting a power different from your class. (If that's what the feats do. It might be different, but I hope it comes at least close ).