cleric switching god

smootrk said:
A cleric who has a lack of devotion during a time of crisis is not good role-play. Like someone else remarked... the Cleric is there to serve the Deity.... The Deity is not there to serve the needs of one of his (apparently) non-faithful who lapses during a trying time.

*calmly points out again that we are talking about months of torture here, not just "hm... my car is broken and I need to buy a new one, so I have to cease playing golf twice a week for a month or two" or "just as I have cast my last healing spell, I get a cut in the cheek. Now I'm not looking perfect anymore untill tomorrow morning, Lathander must have abandoned me, now I'm a follower of Moander."*

Be peaceful about this. These are my opinions (and others as well), and they are not LE or Draconian. They may not work for your group's dynamic, but they are sound and plausible for many others. A cleric should be the very model of devotion and loyalty in all situations, as they would probably see any trying moments as 'tests of faith'.

Not really. This *is* a two-way thing, especially in the Realms. Sure, clerics have to be devout and loyal, but they can also expect that their deity cares for them. The cleric needs his deity. The deity needs his cleric. They both have responsibilities. They don't have to take anything that's thrown at them and consider it "tests of faith".
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I think that someone who role-plays a Bard who cannot sing (for whatever reason), or a very clumsy rogue, or a weakling fighter, or even the cleric without devotion, can be seen as doing good 'role-play'.

However, in any of these situations, I do not believe there should be any great surprise at abilities that are hampered by this role-play choice. Maybe over time, with good role-play, bonus xp are in order for players taking on these roles, but this depends on the group playing.

As a side note. I have a player who is playing a Mute Mime Bard in my campaign, and I think his ideas are wonderful. He is not however surprised when he finds difficulties using some abilities. He uses the difficulties as fuel for his role-play; he is not power-gaming in any sense.
 

smootrk said:
I think that someone who role-plays a Bard who cannot sing (for whatever reason), or a very clumsy rogue, or a weakling fighter, or even the cleric without devotion, can be seen as doing good 'role-play'.

However, in any of these situations, I do not believe there should be any great surprise at abilities that are hampered by this role-play choice. Maybe over time, with good role-play, bonus xp are in order for players taking on these roles, but this depends on the group playing.

As a side note. I have a player who is playing a Mute Mime Bard in my campaign, and I think his ideas are wonderful. He is not however surprised when he finds difficulties using some abilities. He uses the difficulties as fuel for his role-play; he is not power-gaming in any sense.

I don't known the whole situation, but if i'm correct the character or player could be very piss off about religion, cleric and the whole world and situation. I would probably give him a bonus if he was able to join Tyr and overcome any difficulty he would have.

Anyway i don't know two DM who handle xp bonus exactly the same, so this only a particular opinion of mine. But i try to encourage good roleplay usually with bonus, not a huge bonus, but just enought to encourage the player and tell him good work you did well...
 

KaeYoss said:
Not really. This *is* a two-way thing, especially in the Realms. Sure, clerics have to be devout and loyal, but they can also expect that their deity cares for them. The cleric needs his deity. The deity needs his cleric. They both have responsibilities. They don't have to take anything that's thrown at them and consider it "tests of faith".

Hello,

Correct me if i'm wrong, you seem to know well forgotten realms. Does the god power is proportionnal to the number of followers ? That would mean that the god should take care about his follower more then ever according to me.
 

MoonZar said:
Hello,

Correct me if i'm wrong, you seem to know well forgotten realms. Does the god power is proportionnal to the number of followers ? That would mean that the god should take care about his follower more then ever according to me.

He is correct in this sense. I however may disagree somewhat over what exactly are the Deities responsibility. As I see it (again, another opinion), the deity's role has more to do with the final state of the believer's soul or spirit ( final salvation, eternal rest, petitioners, etc. - exact nature of which would depend on the mythos in question).

The deity would also be there to help his faithful (as I guess you are supposing). And I would agree that the Cleric would have a special place in the Deity's plan, and would gain powers and protection -- the powers and protections that the cleric is already granted (again, this is my opinion of what you are supposing)
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by BalazarIago
It is not the place of a priest to decide if the actions of his God were appropriate or not. What exactly did he expect his God to do? Send an Avatar to kill the goblins and rescue the important and obviously devout 3rd level cleric?



I side with you. The gods don't save their follower's backsides personally all the time (except if the goddess in question is named Mystra and the follower is Elminster, of course, but then, you can argue that lovers look out for each other ;-)). But that's not really the point. That poor guy did just endure months of torture, which is a tremendous strain on body, mind, soul and spirit. He felt left alone by his god. Things like this can change person.
************

I don't argue that the priest went through a tremendous ordeal. I guess the main question I have here is what did the character expect his God to do? What would have had to happen for the priest to feel that his God had not abandoned him?



Quote:

Who is to say that his God did not arrange for the arrival of the adventuring party or that He stayed the hand of the goblin leaders.
If that were true, than there would have been a sooner rescue.
**************

That would have to depend on how long it takes to manipulate the world to cause the desired effect. Having no experience with this, I will have to defer to others on this.


Quote:
Who is to say that the priest was not being punished for his lack of faith, or even tested to see if he is worthy.


The fact that we're talking about Lathander. Lathander's neither evil nor stern. Lolth does things like that to her followers all the time, for she's evil and chaotic. Ilmater might do things like that, since he's the deity of suffering. Even deities like Tyr or Helm might do it, for they demand blind obedience. But Lathander is a gentle soul. He tests the hearts of his followers in different ways. (For example, he might let one of his followers fail in a athletic contest even though he's the best sportsman in there, because he didn't train hard enough. By thinking he was good enough for the rest, he stopped becoming better. Only if he tried hard he'd become the best again.)

Quote:

If the priest feels that at the first sign of personal anguish, lose and setback, is a sign that his God has forsaken him, then he obviously places more value on his role in the Church that is reasonable.


I'm sorry? First sign of anguish? He was tortured for months. After he had to witness most of his comrades die. The fact that he survived this shows that he's all but squeamish.

Quote:
As for him changing Gods. An Evil God might take him, just for spite, but a Lawful Good God would not. Who is to say that at the first sign of difficulty, this priest won't bail again. He obviously feels that a God is required to earn his devotion, instead of learning that it is the God who requires a level of devotion and repays that devotion with granting the priest special powers and divine spells.


Again, we aren't talking about "the first sign of difficulty". Tyr would see that this soul has suffered much and now burns with the desire to right the wrong done to him. I'd say that he'll receive him with open hands.

And the gods have to earn the devotion of their followers. After Ao saw that the gods had become careless, he first cast them down onto the Prime, and after the Time of Troubles was over, he declared that the power of a deity is directly dependant on his followers, so they actually have to vie for them. That's also the reason why only deities can grant divine magic now.
**********************

I misspoke regarding this due to the fact that I forgot we were talking about Forgotten Realms. Based on your above comment, then yes, I can see Tyr taking the priest into his fold.

Hrmmm, makes you wonder if Tyr arranged for the Priest to be captured and tortured so that his view of the world would be drastically changed and therefore want to join Tyr.

I can understand the young priest having this crisis of faith. Wondering why his God had forsaken him, or what he had done for his God to ignore his pleas for help and salvation. To be honest, this is something only his DM can answer.

For the record, I don't see the actions of the Character as a sign of bad roleplaying. I think that the player is doing very well. But I do question if the player is playing a Cleric well. But that is mostly left up to opinion.

A priest who has been given the powers of his God, who has been blessed with divine powers and divine spells, is someone special and has a special link with his God. They are not friends, but they have a very strong bond. In the opinion of the character (and the Player by default), the God has made a horrible breach of trust and as such, the priest is leaving the fold. I have no problem with any of that, but one thing I would expect to see from that priest would be to search out why. Why did his God forsake him. Why did his God ignore his pleas. This is something, as a priest, I would want to know. Did I do something wrong?

The fact that the priest has changed his outlook because the events that occured, not withstanding, does not change who the character is at heart. He is angry, he feels betrayed and he wants vengence. The interesting thing I see here, is that he does not want vengence on those who hurt him physically, but he wants vengence on the God who let it happen.
 

MoonZar said:
Correct me if i'm wrong, you seem to know well forgotten realms. Does the god power is proportionnal to the number of followers ? That would mean that the god should take care about his follower more then ever according to me.

At least in part, yes. The deity's power is also determined by the relative strengths of his or her portfolio in the Realms.

Thus, if Tyrrany is on the increase throughout the Realms, the god who has Tyrrany in his portfolio (Bane) will also gain in power, through "indirect" worship.

Thus, deity's scheme to take portfolios away from each other, gaining more worshippers (both direct and indirect) as well as influence in the Realms.
 

Patryn of Elvenshae said:
At least in part, yes. The deity's power is also determined by the relative strengths of his or her portfolio in the Realms.

Thus, if Tyrrany is on the increase throughout the Realms, the god who has Tyrrany in his portfolio (Bane) will also gain in power, through "indirect" worship.

Thus, deity's scheme to take portfolios away from each other, gaining more worshippers (both direct and indirect) as well as influence in the Realms.

Thanks you for the clarification, this very confusing from one world to another, how the god actually work.
 

briand97 said:
I have a player who is currently running a cleric of lathander (F realms setting). Most of his party was slain by kobolds; he and one other member of the party were held hostage and tortured / beaten for several months until another paty rescued them.

He feels that Lathander turned his back on him and that a strong god would never allow this to have happenned. Now he wants to become a cleric of Tyr - the god of retribution and justice. I think the story fits but have a difficult time beleiving that the church of lathander would hold no ill will towards him vise versa... and that it would be as easy as saying Lathander sucks and I follow tyr now.

What do you think. What would be an appropriate hoop to jump through to do this. Currently I'm toying with making him adventure without his clerical abilities and take a level in fighter - then a quest for the church of Tyr.

ideas welcome

I think that the best thing to happen would be this:

http://www.kenzerco.com/periodicals/fuzzyknights/fkonline050415.php

"Lathander, it's not you, it's me..."
 


Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top