Absolutely, why would it not be? Energy Resistance is applied every time you take energy damage--for instance, did you know that the Scorching Ray spell allows Energy Resistance for each ray (so Energy Resistance 30 makes you immune to the spell, even with 3 rays).Felon said:The Clinging Breath feat from Draconomicon causes a breath weapon to inflict extra damage to a creature on the following round. Is energy resistance fully applied to the follow-up damage as well?
Hey, man, you're living in the past! That is so 3.0 of you.pawsplay said:Moreover, energy resistance is applied per round, not per attack.
Note also that the description on pg. 314 of the MM concurs.DMG said:Each resistance ability is defined by what energy type it resists and how many points of damage are resisted. For example, a janni has resistance to fire 10. A janni can ignore the first 10 points of fire damage it takes each attack. It doesn’t matter whether the damage has a mundane or magical source.
Infiniti2000 said:Hey, man, you're living in the past! That is so 3.0 of you.![]()
In 3.5, resist energy is applied per attack. This is evident in the spell resist energy and in the DMG (pg. 298), which admittedly has more text than the SRD. Notably:
Note also that the description on pg. 314 of the MM concurs.
Odd!pawsplay said:Moreover, energy resistance is applied per round, not per attack.
frankthedm said:Odd!
Resist Energy Spell
....The subject gains energy resistance 10 against the energy type chosen, meaning that each time the creature is subjected to such damage (whether from a natural or magical source), that damage is reduced by 10 points before being applied to the creature’s hit points.
Resistance To Energy Special Ability Entry http://www.d20srd.org/srd/specialAbilities.htm#resistanceToEnergy
A creature with resistance to energy has the ability (usually extraordinary) to ignore some damage of a certain type each round, but it does not have total immunity....
Probably, especially since the example in the DMG which was not reproduced in the SRD gives a different interpretation from the surrounding text.pawsplay said:Hm, should this be errata?