D&D 5E (2024) CoDzilla? Yeah Na Its CoDGFaW.

So....

What exactly is the difference between Cleric-or-Druid-zilla and Cleric-or-Druid-Goes-for-a-Walk?

Because both of them seem to be the open admission that spellcaster >>> non-spellcaster unless spellcaster gets nerfed by GM.

Which is precisely the balance problem D&D has been struggling with for...um...how long has D&D existed again, minus the years of The Edition That Must Not Be Named?

People keep talking about how the balance concerns are overblown etc. etc. etc., and yet I'm hearing exactly the same things I've been hearing since, like, 2002-ish. Specific types of Wizards are awesome, and require careful play but good play rewards you much, much more than any other class. Clerics and Druids, when competently played and using the spells as written, run rings around anyone else (in this case, almost literally). Fighters can only barely keep up, and that only by being giant meatsticks with little to no utility value beyond "HULK SMASH!!!"

Like, how are we not exactly where we've been for the past 25 freaking years, minus the few years where 4e actually did something different for once?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Back in 3E the term CoDzilla was thrown around. It mostly referred to natural spell feat/overall druidic power level and a cleric using divine Metamagic to make buffs last 24/7. The cleric at least was mostly a high level theory craft build. Druid not so much it wasn't a very popular class in any event regardless of its power.
Experiences vary on that for druid.

My experience on 3e clerics being CoDzilla was not dependent on sourcebook supplement feats. Being a full caster with access to their whole spell list everyday plus full armor and d8 HD was enough. Not the biggest damage dealer (spell or immediate round weapon attacks) or constant save or die SAD builds, but really really strong. At higher levels generally being better fighters after two buffs at the same general time scry buff teleport came online was pretty big.

5e cleric spirit guardians is hugely powerful and changes the feel of the class and not in a way that supports the classical clerical themes IMO.
 


So....

What exactly is the difference between Cleric-or-Druid-zilla and Cleric-or-Druid-Goes-for-a-Walk?

Because both of them seem to be the open admission that spellcaster >>> non-spellcaster unless spellcaster gets nerfed by GM.

Which is precisely the balance problem D&D has been struggling with for...um...how long has D&D existed again, minus the years of The Edition That Must Not Be Named?

People keep talking about how the balance concerns are overblown etc. etc. etc., and yet I'm hearing exactly the same things I've been hearing since, like, 2002-ish. Specific types of Wizards are awesome, and require careful play but good play rewards you much, much more than any other class. Clerics and Druids, when competently played and using the spells as written, run rings around anyone else (in this case, almost literally). Fighters can only barely keep up, and that only by being giant meatsticks with little to no utility value beyond "HULK SMASH!!!"

Like, how are we not exactly where we've been for the past 25 freaking years, minus the few years where 4e actually did something different for once?

Its not as overpowering as 3E and you want some martials around.

Pre 3E clerics weren't that great.

Its more interesting spellcaster balance. See previous comments about fireball, wizards etc.

No one really does enough damage solo in 5.5 relative to hp.

Best gish builds are clerics and druids. They just dont use weapons (well they might but not required).
 

Experiences vary on that for druid.

My experience on 3e clerics being CoDzilla was not dependent on sourcebook supplement feats. Being a full caster with access to their whole spell list everyday plus full armor and d8 HD was enough. Not the biggest damage dealer (spell or immediate round weapon attacks) or constant save or die SAD builds, but really really strong. At higher levels generally being better fighters after two buffs at the same general time scry buff teleport came online was pretty big.

5e cleric spirit guardians is hugely powerful and changes the feel of the class and not in a way that supports the classical clerical themes IMO.

I fid see tge persistent spell cleric in action.

Its a similar situation to CME in 5.5. If you have to hard cast it in combat its not as good as precast.

Persistent spell cleric was lvl 9 3.0. And 12+ 3.5 to be espicially good and required a lot of splat. Saw it i. 3.0, 3.5 required more effort to build it.
 


Animals is dex and 3d10 vs spirits wis 3d8 half on a save. But the cleric has to sit in the middle of spirits while the Druid has no such limit with animals.

Derp dex save.

Aware ive seen Conure Animals whiff a bit.

Clerics usually have decent AC snd a few pick up shield spell these days. Warcasters basically a no brainer.
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top