College Football 2006

I blame this game more on the lack of defense (that last punt for TO should not have happened) for the WVU than any troubles on the offense. (Though the fumbles/turnovers didn't help.) White proved to be a leader on offense, and with Slayton coming back, gave some life to the offense. It was the D that needed to step it up. Which didn't and thus now I have to cheer for Rutgers and hope the Eers can beat them so title hopes are still there.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Nightfall said:
I blame this game more on the lack of defense (that last punt for TO should not have happened) for the WVU than any troubles on the offense. (Though the fumbles/turnovers didn't help.) White proved to be a leader on offense, and with Slayton coming back, gave some life to the offense. It was the D that needed to step it up. Which didn't and thus now I have to cheer for Rutgers and hope the Eers can beat them so title hopes are still there.

Dude, it's Slaton, not Slayton.
 



Crothian said:
Rutgers has the defense to do it.

I'm not completely sold on that; they've been able to stop good running teams that can't pass (Navy) and good passing teams that can't run (Pitt), but if Brohm's clicking (and as of last night, he is) then Louisville's better on the ground than Navy and better in the air than Pitt.
 

I only saw Rutgers play once, but the defense looked good. I don't know if they can stop the Cards but I think they have a good shot.
 


Bad, BAD overturn on the replay. Maryland had the safety there. Not sure how they justified overturning that.

Edit: And it looks like it might have.
 



Remove ads

Top