College Football 2006


log in or register to remove this ad




Okay, it's official. Washington still sucks. They fooled me with their 4-1 start, but now I see them for what they are, a bunch of underachieving, no-talent hacks.
 


Dungannon said:
Okay, it's official. Washington still sucks. They fooled me with their 4-1 start, but now I see them for what they are, a bunch of underachieving, no-talent hacks.
I wouldn't go that far. 4 of their 6 losses were to ranked opponents, and another to an improved Oregon State team. The other loss was to an Arizona State team that no one can figure out.

Right now, Washington is winning the games they should, and losing the ones they should. Considering how bad they've been, I think they're pointed in the right direction. They have a good coach who is doing good things in his first year. Give them another year or two and then we'll see. But for now, I think they're on the right track. The Pac 10 is pretty tough this year.
 


Dungannon said:
Eh, Washington's ok except for two things. They can't run the ball and they can't stop the run. Other than that... :\

... and this is going to be a problem against most of the Pac 10?

Disclaimer: Stylisticly, I like the pass-focused (by college standards) Pac 10, and think claims that running and stopping the run are of primary importance are nonsense; passing and stopping the pass are, for teams running pro-style offenses (which most Pac 10 teams do, and all NFL teams except Atlanta do), the primary keys to winning.
 


Remove ads

Top