Between that and my Orange doing much the same thing (save for the FSU game), it's almost enough to make me give up on my "home" teams and become another loser who moved out west and jumped on the USC bandwagon...Crothian said:Ya, and the Buckeyes are really showing that they suck this year![]()
The whole point of jumping on a bandwagon is to cheer for winners, which means the Aztecs are right out (routinely losing by a field goal to the Big 10 champ doesn't cut it), and Fresno's farther from San Diego than LA, not on TV as much (TV isn't as much of an issue with the Aztecs, as I could pretty easily go see games live; it's not like they sell out the stadium), and in a second-rate confrence.Crothian said:Go with San Diego State!! Or Fresno State!!
Only marginally, and it least in the old system we always got Big 10 v. Pac 10 Rose Bowls, and nothing utterly loony, like a Big 10/Pac 10 Orange Bowl a few years back [USC v. Iowa, when co-Big 10 champ Ohio Stae played Miami for all the marbles, and co-Pac 10 champ Washingto State played Texas in the Rose].Crothian said:BCS ranking are out and the crying and complaining have started. It's funny to hear all the complaints and all the problems when in reality the BCS has worked better then the old system.
Well, for us Ohio natives, it was a great game, and much better than "USC ends Buckeyes' national title hopes", which we almost certainly would have gotten in the old system. And as a Syracuse fan, watching Miami lose always has a certain appeal. But who's to say that USC-Ohio State wouldn't have been a classic?Crothian said:Ya, some of the traditions of the old Bowl system have to be sacraficed but I think we get better Bowl games for it. The OSU Miami game was a classic.