Probably not. D&D games almost have a reputation now of being crap, doesn't matter who develops them. I knew SCL was going to be bad just because is a D&D game.
That's not my point. My point is that it isn't D&D itself that makes the game bad. We can (and have had) great D&D games. The brand itself does not ipso facto mean the game automatically fails. If you see the D&D brand being used... you think it's going to be bad not because it's a game about D&D... but because you know that only crap companies that make pretty bad games are USING the D&D brand. You know the meta of the situation-- quality RPG video game companies aren't using the D&D brand, and in recent years only crap companies hoping to bank on the D&D rep are using it. And not doing a good job.
But as soon as some company makes a quality D&D game, then all will be forgiven. You'll pick it up and play it. Unless of course you're telling me that you refuse to play any D&D video game anymore just because "it's a D&D video game, and thus I refuse"? I find that hard to believe. Sure, you aren't willing to pick up a D&D game sight-unseen (but then again, I don't do that either because I think pre-ordering is foolish and unnecessary as a matter of course)... but once you hear the reviews and see the demos, you'll pick up a new CRPG just like the rest of us.
The Fantastic Four brand for films is pretty crap right now. But that in no way means that someone CAN'T make a good Fantastic Four movie, nor that most people will refuse to see it once the reviews come in and it turns out it's really good (even though the last three weren't.) But if someone DOES refuse to see a new quality FF film just because the others were crap... then they're cutting off their nose to spite their face.
Which I don't doubt there are some doofuses out there who would do that. But it doesn't mean that they are right.