Companies you wish would do better


log in or register to remove this ad

Re: Re: Re: Companies you wish would do better

chatdemon said:

Why is Avalanche the only one who ever gets bashed? Because it's cool to bash them for it?

Easy.

Avalanche is the only d20 publisher that insists on depicting scantily-clad women on *every* single cover, with no sign of stopping.

It is a cheap marketing ploy for young men to purchase their stuff. Well, it is the only way one would ever purchase it, when considering their poor grasp of all things d20 and this screw up.

Avalanche... bah.

[EDIT: I made a small error... it seems that out of 14 d20 products, there are actually TWO books that don't have loads of woman-flesh on their covers. Still, two out of 14.]
 
Last edited:


chatdemon said:
Oh, I have no problem for critiquing Avalanche's content, or that of any publisher. I don't even really have a problem with those who complain about the 'cheesecake' art in some products. I'm just saying that complaining about one companies use of 'sexy' art while overlooking the tendency of the entire industry to make use of that material is unfair.

I see your point, and I agree with it. I criticized Avalanche's art because it really isn't very good. If they're going to go the "Vargas" or "good girl art" route, they should get some really good artists for it, because otherwise it just looks lousy.
 

Scantily clad women only bother me when there're no scantily clad men on the covers. WotC doesn't have this problem, as several of the iconic men are definitely worth looking at.
 

My only gripe involving scantily clad women comes from Mongoose's Quint series. I haven't seen their newer Q Books, but I hope the art has improved.

I bought QRogue first, and was appalled at some of the art. I didn't even read the book for a while because of the poor impression I got. (I suppose if I hadn't asked my comic shop dude to order it and had then flipped through it, I would not have bought it.) In the meantime, I passed over Cleric when I flipped through it at the store. Finally gave Rogue a good read, liked it, and bought Wizard, but still, I couldn't believe that with the good artists they'd accumulated that they were still using filler from that guy whose art training seems to come soley from comic books. I can't read his tiny signature, but try QW page 76. Is it a naked man with a belt? Or did spandex show up in a medieval fantasy setting? See also QW pg 20, 77, 78, 106, 107, and Vampirella-Spawn on pg 118. 120 is probably the only drawing of his that I like, and the shading is still half-wrong.
 

SP

I need to learn how to edit.

Sometimes I think a drunken monkey gets hold of the issues right before they are printed. Whacked on Night Train, he adds all sorts of typos and awkward sentences.

Silly little monkeys.

EDIT: I spelled monkey wrong. See, they're at it again!
 
Last edited:

die_kluge said:
No one's mentioned Mystic Eye/Thunderhead Games.

Guess that means we're perfect. :)

Almost! The worst thing I could say about MEG is that some of your fonts are not to my liking ( and too many different fonts on the same page ) and some layouts/pagination need improving ( side text too close to boxed text in some cases for example )

Also, you should probably charge more too. 128 pages is defintely worth $19.95 VS. $16.95!

Did I just type that? Am i Crazy?
 

die_kluge said:
No one's mentioned Mystic Eye/Thunderhead Games.

Guess that means we're perfect. :)

Okay, I held back but if you really want to know what you guys can do better at is: More Bluffside Stuff. :D
 

Crothian said:


Okay, I held back but if you really want to know what you guys can do better at is: More Bluffside Stuff. :D


Apparently, your wish is their command! Here's the most recent news posting at the MEG site: "Raw Recruits for Dragonstar and Interludes: Sands of Pain are available now for pre-sale direct from our site. Be the first on your block to own these exciting titles."
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top