Maester Luwin
First Post
Hey everyone! Not to get too off topic but does anyone know how the second edition will differ from the current? Also does anyone know when this will be coming out? Thanks Maester Luwin
Maester Luwin said:Hey everyone! Not to get too off topic but does anyone know how the second edition will differ from the current? Also does anyone know when this will be coming out? Thanks Maester Luwin
Jim Hague said:The Conan RPG's one flaw is that it doesn't model the quick and dirty flow that characterized the Conan stories.
Part of the trouble with doing Conan right is that no one can seem to agree on what the flavor of Conan should be. Some think it should be super-gritty, uber realist, while others think it should be more cinematic.
Teflon Billy said:I hear you, and I love the Conan books in general, but what brought me into the character way, way back in the day was a long-running (now defunct) magazine called Savage Sword of Conan.
For whatever reason they are basically worth nothing now, if you go to aComic Shop you will likley be able to pick them up for about a buck apiece. they are great inspiration for a Conan game: bleak, bloody, amoral and fun
The art (usually by a dude named Ernie Chan) is uniformly great and inspiring.
GlassJaw said:Hmm, well I think it certainly models the "dirty" quite well. It's a deadly system. I would agree that it's certainly not rules-light but I don't think it's any more or less cumbersome than standard 3.5.
I think the rules are more on the gritty/realist side, which is generally easier to model through mechanics. There are certainly plenty of rules options for some more cinematic events though. Check out the optional Parrying Rules (pg. 150), especially Weapon Breakage. Nothing like having your weapon break in the middle of combat! The Combat Maneuvers (or manoeuvres if you are so inclined) section has a lot of cool actions as well.
GlassJaw said:What an awful post
Umbran said:...to not have to put up with you stereotyping them. Dude, you know broad and vaguely insulting generalizations are bad mojo around here. Please get rid of it, or I'll have to do it for you.
Emirikol said:Take a chill pill guys. I posted that way to show that Hyboria is a fight-pickin', tough world, not some pansy-unicorn world Looks like some of you bit It's a simple our world is better than your world post. Relax.
jh/
You're right that you'll draw fire... But I'll just say it's a matter of apples and oranges and have done with. Pulp fantasy and literary fantasy are two very different subgenres, and REH and JRRT are very clearly entrenched in one of those respective subgenres. I do think that where REH attempted to "cross over" (Hour of the Dragon, for instance) his prose was at its weakest.Jim Hague said:I know I'll draw fire from the tolkien folks here, but I really, really consider REH to be a far superior fantasist to JRRT or Moorcock. Conan grabbed me story-wise in ways the works of those two never have.
ruleslawyer said:But I'll just say it's a matter of apples and oranges and have done with. Pulp fantasy and literary fantasy are two very different subgenres, and REH and JRRT are very clearly entrenched in one of those respective subgenres.