Bigby's Handbook? Eh, that sounds worse...I think I prefer the real title of the book to the fake title in this thread. Bigby Presents: Glory of the Giants sounds fine but Bigby's Big Book just sounds like some genre of porn to me.
Is it just me?
there is no possible way to make anything with Bigby sound professional in any situation.Bigby's Handbook? Eh, that sounds worse...
Aah, how did I forget about seeingTasha's had a picture of Azalin it under the "Lich Patron", before Van Richten's came out and one of the Planescape Factols in it, in the Patrons section (she was training some newbs in a gym).
Speaking as someone who doesn’t really care about past editions and their deep dives, and so who is not really comparing the new books, I loved Fizban’s. It’s precisely what I want from a D&D supplement.I'm pretty sure those are both books' names. No, I'm not double-checking.
So, I got the digital version of Fizban's, partly for a player who's running a Dragonborn in one of my games, but partly because I had a lot of good memories of the 3E Draconomicon, which is one of the all-time great D&D books. Completely gorgeous, tons of lore about every aspect of dragons, a ton of player-facing content and so many great monsters.
Fizban's, let's say, did not measure up for me. It's fine, don't get me wrong, but boy, it does not measure up. It is a C/C+ book when I was hoping to see another A+ book.
But maybe that's just me. I have one major dragon in my main campaign, and while I will be throwing in every trick in the book when the PCs finally fight her, beyond that, there's not much draconic content I can see using after that.
Considering that Bigby's is likely to be very similar in structure to Fizban's, am I alone in this? Did you get a lot of value out of Fizban's? If so, what did you do with it? If you're excited about Bigby's, tell me why.
Bigby' Giant [full in the blank] is a historical set of Seplls, most I can think of. That, and he was Gygaxes backup PC.weird choice. Is Bigby associated with giants
So just the naming convention? Like, he liked his magical hands really big, so put him on the Giants book?Bigby' Giant [full in the blank] is a historical set of Seplls, most I can think of. That, and he was Gygaxes backup PC.
Yeah, I really wish there were more well known female named characters to name books after. It’s pretty sad that of all these books’ titular characters, the same number of books have genderless creatures born from nightmares as women.Another point is that there is currently a 100% record of the named NPC in a supplement title showing up in an Adventure the next year...so that may be a clue to 2024 plans.