Rappy
First Post
Monstrous humanoid, then?I'm definitely not a fan of making it humanoid!![]()

In seriousness, we could either stick to the rules or we could take a page from Goodman Games's book (the Broncosaurus Rex books, to be precise

Monstrous humanoid, then?I'm definitely not a fan of making it humanoid!![]()
Monstrous humanoid, then?
In seriousness, we could either stick to the rules or we could take a page from Goodman Games's book (the Broncosaurus Rex books, to be precise) and flub the rules a bit to get a smarter chimp.
While your reasoning makes sense, it also creates all kinds of havoc with the Str 22 dire ape!![]()
Trying to judge D&D animal strength compared to reality is like taking a makeup test...you either grin and bear it or furiously try to rewrite the rules.Yes, I realized that, but it's the Dire Ape's fault for being a weakling. It's got up to twice the bodyweight of an Ogre (800-1200 lbs vs 600-650) but only a point more Strength. Shrink it down to Medium sized and its only Str 14 - most human fighters are stronger than that. It just doesn't feel right, I would like Dire Apes to have a Strength score in the same region as a Hill Giant (Str 25, 1100 lbs), if not a tad more.
Dunno what to do about the dire ape. Probably the best thing to do is mostly ignore it. We could so Str 15-16 chimp and Str 23-24 gorilla, which isn't too far off, if we're really concerned about the dire ape. It's not like we don't choose better feats for dinos, etc, after all.
Yes, I realized that, but it's the Dire Ape's fault for being a weakling. It's got up to twice the bodyweight of an Ogre (800-1200 lbs vs 600-650) but only a point more Strength. Shrink it down to Medium sized and its only Str 14 - most human fighters are stronger than that. It just doesn't feel right, I would like Dire Apes to have a Strength score in the same region as a Hill Giant (Str 25, 1100 lbs), if not a tad more.
And yes, gnolls are humanoids, although I never quite understood it.
Why don't we stick to Int 2 animal and hope Pathfinder fixes that rule?![]()
Dunno what to do about the dire ape. Probably the best thing to do is mostly ignore it. We could so Str 15-16 chimp and Str 23-24 gorilla, which isn't too far off, if we're really concerned about the dire ape. It's not like we don't choose better feats for dinos, etc, after all.
OK, I can agre with that. SRD dire ape = bad example.
If the theoretical reworked dire ape is Str 25 (on par with hill giant), I'd rather the gorilla be closer to the ogre (Str 21).