Spelljammer Converting Spelljammer creatures

[freyar]

That's the same as what I've got, though worded slightly differently, I think. So we just need to settle on the damage. 2d10?

 

[Cleon]

That's the same as what I've got, though worded slightly differently, I think. So we just need to settle on the damage. 2d10?

It also has an Overrun effect against creatures to small to "Trample".

 

[Cleon]

That's the same as what I've got, though worded slightly differently, I think. So we just need to settle on the damage. 2d10?

For the damage, we have "Victims caught by this rolling action suffer 4d6 crushing damage" in the original text.

 

[Shade]

For the damage, we have "Victims caught by this rolling action suffer 4d6 crushing damage" in the original text.

Note our debate on that topic in posts 437-439.

 

[Cleon]

Note our debate on that topic in posts 437-439.

I didn't get where I am today by heeding other peoples' opinions.

How about giving the dodecahedron some love and make it 2d12?

 

[freyar]

It also has an Overrun effect against creatures to small to "Trample".

I don't see anything about creatures being too small to trample in the SRD.

I didn't get where I am today by heeding other peoples' opinions.

How about giving the dodecahedron some love and make it 2d12?

2d12 is ok if Shade agrees. Or rather 2d12+Str?

 

[Cleon]

I don't see anything about creatures being too small to trample in the SRD.

Dang it, I meant too big.

2d12 is ok if Shade agrees. Or rather 2d12+Str?

Or possibly 1.5 Str.

 

[freyar]

2d12 + 1-1/2 Str appeals. I don't think it needs the Overrun bit, though.

 

[Shade]

2d12 + 1-1/2 Str appeals. I don't think it needs the Overrun bit, though.

Agreed on both counts.

Updated.

 

[Cleon]

2d12 + 1-1/2 Str appeals. I don't think it needs the Overrun bit, though.

Agreed on both counts.

Updated.

That's acceptable.

I do think "Rolling Devastation" is a much nicer name, but I shall reserve that for the far superior Cleon Special™ Trample & Overrun version.