Parmandur
Book-Friend, he/him
I recommend trying to get to the end of Part 1 (of 5): by then you will be invested or uninterested.Ya, I think I've been looking at that thick book for five years now.....and haven't opened it yet.
I recommend trying to get to the end of Part 1 (of 5): by then you will be invested or uninterested.Ya, I think I've been looking at that thick book for five years now.....and haven't opened it yet.
Same here. While reading Mistborn I already had movie scenes in my mind - the action scenes are just too good. Mistborn fights with good fx and good action direction gould become so amazing.I'm actually more excited for a Mistborn movie than for the Stormlight TV show.
+1! The only Sanderson work I gave over 4,0 on storygraph. One of my main criticsm of him is his bloated writing, but when he forces himself to be concise like in his novel his true strength emerge IMO.Try reading The Emperor's Soul: very short novella, self-contained and standalone award winning story.
Hm, not sure. I read The Way of Kings last year and I am neither invested nor completely uninterested. I definitely want to continue at one point, but Wheel of Time comes first, much more invested in that series by nowI recommend trying to get to the end of Part 1 (of 5): by then you will be invested or uninterested.
Did the (extended) LotR trilogy?Through their very nature, TV/movie adaptations of novels have to cut out a lot of stuff and make the story tighter.
Yes, even the extended movies cut a huge amount of important material and took shortcuts.Did the (extended) LotR trilogy?
I'm not looking for 'improvements' in TV/movie adaptions, I'm looking for a different medium for the story to be told in. And with books to TV/Movie that change is generally in the audio/visual realm.
Robert Jordan had a much stronger prose style than Sanderson, for sure. For me, even in the stretches where Jordan loses the plot, his prose styling and attention to detail carry it through. I swear you can write a 120 page thesis on how the Wheel of Time achieves world building through in-depth restaurant reviews of the 90-some named Inns that characters visit.Great news, I think apple is the best pick! I think Sandersons work is perfect for TV adaption because his strengths can shine (plotting, action, character interactions) while his weaknesses are mainly of literate nature IMO (I really dislike his prose, especially the internal monologues of his characters). I also hope that we see more of the world in SA than in the first book. I really disliked that we see so little of the world in Way of Kings. Felt not epic at all.
Same here. While reading Mistborn I already had movie scenes in my mind - the action scenes are just too good. Mistborn fights with good fx and good action direction gould become so amazing.
+1! The only Sanderson work I gave over 4,0 on storygraph. One of my main criticsm of him is his bloated writing, but when he forces himself to be concise like in his novel his true strength emerge IMO.
Hm, not sure. I read The Way of Kings last year and I am neither invested nor completely uninterested. I definitely want to continue at one point, but Wheel of Time comes first, much more invested in that series by now![]()
Yeah, it’s a matter of pacing and rhythm as well as content. The BBC radio version picked that up better than the movies.Yes, even the extended movies cut a huge amount of important material and took shortcuts.
The Lord of the Rings would be better off as a six season TV show, to properly draw out everything.
Indeed! Frankly I would love it if someone did a long form TV version someday that has all the songs, Tom Bombadil, the Scouring and all the walking not simply montages away.Yeah, it’s a matter of pacing and rhythm as well as content. The BBC radio version picked that up better than the movies.