Jürgen Hubert said:
In other words: Don't attempt to equate American distances to distances in a fantasy world with a medieval society.
It was a joke. I live in New Hampshire, which together with Vermont, Maine, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island make New England. The New England states are all dinky compared to the rest of the US. If anyone empathizes with Europeans travelling in the US, it's us.
I thought Geren = Australia made for a simple comparison, plus I was going off of Yair's statement a few pages ago: when you asked how big we should make it, he replied...
Yair said:
Not sure yet, but I'm leaning towards "Really Huge".
I'm fine with the new numbers. They certainly don't rule out dozens and dozens of little states -- how many were there in Germany in the (Late, I think) Middle Ages?
Jürgen Hubert said:
It's more of a different mindset. There's just so much diversity on Eurasia that we would need an exceedingly long country list to cover it all.
I don't mind a long country list. Both GH and FR, our "inspirations" for this, cover quite a bit of land and diversity.
On that note, I want to make sure this doesn't get lost:
Jürgen Hubert said:
I'd say that we should have a dozen major countries or so that have aligned themselves with one side or another (in other words, five to seven on each side), and slightly less than that who haven't, not counting a larger number of city-states and small fiefdoms who either support one of the sides or are trying hard to remain neutral.
That sounds like appoximately 25-30 various political states, which I think is GOOD number.