Dr. Harry
First Post
Eyrosian Astronomy
I really hope that I didn't miss somebody grabbing these threads already, but ...
Even if the orbit is markedly elliptical, this would accentuate the seasons and not make them vary. I suggest that the base cause of the seasons is, like Earth, due to the tilt of the axis of rotation to the plane of its orbit, and that the Sun is a variable star with a period of about (but not quite - I have a reason for this) a year. The star has periods of quiescence in which its energy output drops suficiently to make the planet experience a short term cooling trend. In the distant past this cool period corresponded with summer in Eyros, making the seasons in general mild. (As described in the ground rules.) As the "cool" period shifts over time, it is coming to align with winter in Eyros, meaning that the winters would be getting colder. While the winters might not be to the point of catastrophic, a culture used to very weak seasons might be alarmed enough about this to describe it as being almost able to "blast all life from the land".
Interestingly enough, there are some standard (Main Sequence) stars that are inherently unstable. In astronomical terms, this would be about a type A7V star -- substantially more blue than our Sun and therefore hotter, requiring that the planet be father away, thus giving rise to a longer year and a smaller apparent size for the Sun. This star would be about 10 times the luminosity of the Sun, so my first guess would put the apparent size of the sun of Eyros as about 1/2 the apparent size of the Sun in the sky. The planet would have to be about 3 times farther away from its sun than Earth is from Sol. The period would be close to 600 days. I could do the math more accurately if anyone cared.
The two moons would have to be in orbits that are 90 degrees apart. Two moons opposite to each other would produce exceptionally strong tides
Isn't nice to have this world of half-orcs, gnomish necromancers, and ancient magics astronomically viable? (ish)
Although ...
Why is the period of the star's variablility so gosh-darn close to the length of the year?
Why are there two moons that are held in an unstable position? What's holding them there?
I really hope that I didn't miss somebody grabbing these threads already, but ...
Eosin the Red said:The planet of Eyros circles a blue sun in a slightly erratic and ellipical orbit both winters and summers vary greatly from year to year (some winters are mild while others nearly snuff the life from the land). The sun appears about 75% of the size of Sol and a year is significantly longer than an Earth year.
Even if the orbit is markedly elliptical, this would accentuate the seasons and not make them vary. I suggest that the base cause of the seasons is, like Earth, due to the tilt of the axis of rotation to the plane of its orbit, and that the Sun is a variable star with a period of about (but not quite - I have a reason for this) a year. The star has periods of quiescence in which its energy output drops suficiently to make the planet experience a short term cooling trend. In the distant past this cool period corresponded with summer in Eyros, making the seasons in general mild. (As described in the ground rules.) As the "cool" period shifts over time, it is coming to align with winter in Eyros, meaning that the winters would be getting colder. While the winters might not be to the point of catastrophic, a culture used to very weak seasons might be alarmed enough about this to describe it as being almost able to "blast all life from the land".
Interestingly enough, there are some standard (Main Sequence) stars that are inherently unstable. In astronomical terms, this would be about a type A7V star -- substantially more blue than our Sun and therefore hotter, requiring that the planet be father away, thus giving rise to a longer year and a smaller apparent size for the Sun. This star would be about 10 times the luminosity of the Sun, so my first guess would put the apparent size of the sun of Eyros as about 1/2 the apparent size of the Sun in the sky. The planet would have to be about 3 times farther away from its sun than Earth is from Sol. The period would be close to 600 days. I could do the math more accurately if anyone cared.
domino said:You beat me to it!!!!Jakar said:Originally Posted by Jakar
Damn it!!! I was just going to post that the planet does not have a moon, therefore no tides or surf to speak of.
You could say that there are TWO moons, each locked in opposite positions on the same orbit, thus they cancel out the tides.
The two moons would have to be in orbits that are 90 degrees apart. Two moons opposite to each other would produce exceptionally strong tides
Isn't nice to have this world of half-orcs, gnomish necromancers, and ancient magics astronomically viable? (ish)
Although ...
Why is the period of the star's variablility so gosh-darn close to the length of the year?
Why are there two moons that are held in an unstable position? What's holding them there?