Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players

The new campaign kicks off in October.
1755798535831.png


Critical Role will continue to use Dungeons & Dragons as the play system for its upcoming campaign, with the cast expanding to three distinct tables consisting of a total of 13 players. Today, Critical Role announced new details about its new campaign, which is set to air on October 4th. The new campaign will feature the full founding cast members as players, alongside several new players. In total, the cast includes Laura Bailey, Luis Carazo, Robbie Daymond, Aabria Iyengar, Taliesin Jaffe, Ashley Johnson, Matthew Mercer, Whitney Moore, Liam O’Brien, Marisha Ray, Sam Riegel, Alexander Ward, and Travis Willingham, with the previously announced Brennan Lee Mulligan serving as GM.

The campaign itself will be run as a "West Marches" style of campaign, with three separate groups of players exploring the world. The groups are divided into gameplay styles, with a combat-focused Soldiers group, a lore/exploration-focused Seekers group, and a intrigue-focused Schemers group. All three groups will explore the world of Araman, created by Mulligan for the campaign.

Perhaps most importantly, Critical Role will not be switching to Daggerheart for the fourth campaign. Instead, they'll be opting for the new 2024 ruleset of Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition. Daggerheart will be represented at Critical Role via the Age of Umbra and "other" Actual Play series, as well as partnerships with other Actual Play troupes.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer

I know it's kind of just accepted that DH is doing great...but I'd love to get an actual number on these print runs that are selling out and how they compare to say PF or even CoC sales... much less D&D.

Edit: I just have a feeling... contrary to what many youtubers are trying to project....they are nowhere near enough for CR to risk their main show on
 

log in or register to remove this ad




I did not say they were bad designers. I said that they weren't any better. They were "poached" because they are famous in the field.

According to Perkins and Crawford they were considering retiring, which makes sense considering that they were there for a long time and had gotten the 2024 version out the door while having input for future direction. There wasn't a lot to challenge.

So I see no reason to say they were "poached" other than another unfounded dig at WOTC.
 

According to Perkins and Crawford they were considering retiring, which makes sense considering that they were there for a long time and had gotten the 2024 version out the door while having input for future direction. There wasn't a lot to challenge.

So I see no reason to say they were "poached" other than another unfounded dig at WOTC.
That is why I put it in quotes -- it was not my assertion.
 



Im sure the poster didn't read your mind before posting... and his claim was no one... do you represent everyone's opinion now? If not... I dont understand the point of your post?
My point was that they're not alone in their feelings, as you implied IMO. Was that not clear?
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top