Tony Vargas
Legend
Sorry, AV = Adventurer's Vault.Sorry, but I don't know what that is.
Sorry, AV = Adventurer's Vault.Sorry, but I don't know what that is.
Actually, the originals did specify levels, but I didn't think it was in the spirit of 5e, with it's no-wealth/level, no-make/buy mandates. Also, I forgot that Dominated & Charmed weren't separate conditions. ;(One thing - having one and the same item used for both a low-level and a high-level spell (charm person is 1st level as we all know; dominate monster is 8thlevel in this edition) does the pricer no favors.
I give you that it doesn't feel like 5th edition to start talking about "this thing here can be used for levels 1-3, that thang over there for levels 4-6".Actually, the originals did specify levels, but I didn't think it was in the spirit of 5e, with it's no-wealth/level, no-make/buy mandates. Also, I forgot that Dominated & Charmed weren't separate conditions. ;(
What you could do when pricing them is just give them levels, the higher the level, the higher the price, the spell (or slot, whichever makes more sense to you) must be the same or lower level than the component.
Yeah, my thought after walking away from Dread Nightshade was to make it have a specific effect for Cloudkill & Stinking Cloud and leave it at that. (Other 'poison' spells added to the game? The DM can figure it out. The kind of consistency you get by default from keywords & jargon is very much not the point of 5e.)I give you that it doesn't feel like 5th edition to start talking about "this thing here can be used for levels 1-3, that thang over there for levels 4-6".
I believe 5e would solve this by being highly specific.
Makes sense. And, since you're going for more of a 3e ethos with regard to pricing, you could just scale the price to the level of the spell(s) it can be used with...And then, just to continue the 5e ethos, quite possibly stop there and simply have no items that can affect "strong" magic. Levels 6 and upwards are, after all, "precious" in 5th edition.
The 5e philosophy is supposed to be that magic items make you 'just better.' Extra 6th+ spell slots certainly do that.... The spell gems aren't restricted to the lowest levels (like, say, every similar item from the DMG. Pearls of Power for instance quite deliberately comes in only one, low-level, version nowadays. The ring of spell storing is restricted to, you guessed it, level 5 spells).
The table doesn't even hesitate to introduce level 6-9 spell gems.
as a designer I have to say they represent a failure to truly grok 5th edition.
I blame multi-quote.Now you're even repeating yourself to build dem walls of text Tony![]()