I don’t see a problem. If a table or a player wants to roll, go for it. Maybe something like pick a number and roll 1d6 for which stat it goes with. Then roll 1d5. Etc. It might not be everyone’s taste, but it certainly wouldn’t break anything.
That is definitely technically correct, the best kind of correct, because relatively little in DH inherently uses a fixed stat. Like your damage thresholds? Armour + level. Weapon damage? Stat not involved. Checks and attack rolls do but there's not much advantage to be gained from a +2 over a 0 especially as pretty much all PCs will be using a weapon the have +2 in and mostly rolling the stats they have bonuses in.
You could say the same about half the rules in Daggerheart.
I don't think you could say that, actually. I mean, or if you did, you'd be widely mocked and derided and perhaps rightly so.
Oh, I've disliked rolling for stats since 3.5 DnD. 4e going to point-buy as standard was a selling point for me. Haven't looked back, though I allowed rolling once, when 5e launched, as a convention one-shot. And the Monk rolling double 18s certainly gave me the wrong impression of class balance!
Yes, there's a frame which is like an 1800s Western + Kaiju mash-up - it's pretty cool. It adds kind of elaborate rules (by DH standards) for destroying parts of the Kaiju to take them down.
Colossus of the Dry Lands has kaiju.
