Snarls-at-Fleas said:It really started with Hindu fairy tales where rakshasas could have any kind of animal heads. Or even look like this
![]()
It is Ravana, King of the Rakshsas
Bah.Lord Tirian said:
Goobermunch said:There you go, bringing facts into a discussion.
My point is that within the context of D&D, Rakshasas traditionally have been depicted as orange and black tiger men with reversed hands. The MM3 was, afaik, the first time they were depicted in an official D&D source as being other
In the 2nd edition MM, rakshasas were described as people with backward hands and animal heads, most often ape- or tigerheads.Goobermunch said:It started with Eberron, where they added a few new types of Rakshasas. In the ECS, they added the Zakya Rakshasa. Then, in the MM3, they added the Ak'Chazar and the Naztharune (White Tiger and Black Panther, respectively).
--G
Look again. Bald-zerai has a two-pointed goatee and a soul patch. Bald-yanki has a four-pointed goatee.Hussar said:Hang on a tick.
Doesn't the Githzerai on the left:
[sblock][/sblock]![]()
look almost identical to the Githyanki on the right?
[sblock][/sblock]![]()
Same beard, same features, just a bit different tatoos.
Agreed. Sadly many artists trap themselves into only drawing a few different faces.OakwoodDM said:I'd rather Komarck had used different models for the Githzerai and Githyanki. As it is, it looks like it's the same three people in 2 different poss, and one set has an Astral tan. I have nothing against artists using models, but when it's 2 similar races, please, use different models!
Ah, thats what those hanging flesh sacks on them were called.heirodule said:I want my githyanki to have BURSITIS, dangit.