dead thread - please delete

[Turjan]

On attributes:

I always thought that D&D had one too many mental attributes - but where to draw the line has always been difficult. It's easier to say that there are really two stat-worthy concepts spread over three stats, which have been built on and augmented to provide for their use in other contexts - but remain no less murky on account.

I was thinking a similar thing when pondering the arcane/divine divide, which I find construed. AU/AE had a good solution to the main problem, but the more or less arbitrary use of three different stats for the same thing - magic - remained untouched. I'm really interested how it touches balance when you tamper with the attribute system.

 

[Ry]

mmm

 

[Ry]

mmm

 

[Ry]

mmm

 

[Ry]

mmm

 

[Ry]

mmm

 

[Ry]

mmm

 

[Verequus]

How do you handle the new range of results with the 2d6? Aren't only 11 values too few possibilities? Why don't you use 3d6 or a d12?

 

[Ry]

mmm

 

[Ry]

mmm