December Playtests: Druid, Invoker, AV2, and Mercykillers! (merged)

We'll finally be able to stop arguing about what the Druid is going to be about! (Because, of course, we'll finally know for sure! :p)
Oh please, they'll give us one Build then we will argue about the other :P

But it may also give a hint about how the Shaman and Warden will be like, by cutting down on the possible options for them.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

I've always seen a good use for multi-class only classes to represent Planescape factions and Dragonmarked in Eberron. If the Mercykiller is the Mercykiller faction, it'll be a good preview if such thing is a good to use for all such organizations.

In fact it's so ambiguous to what it is, it could merely be a preview of something from DMG2. Since that's months away. It could even be something for PHB3.
 

I've always seen a good use for multi-class only classes to represent Planescape factions and Dragonmarked in Eberron. If the Mercykiller is the Mercykiller faction, it'll be a good preview if such thing is a good to use for all such organizations.

In fact it's so ambiguous to what it is, it could merely be a preview of something from DMG2. Since that's months away. It could even be something for PHB3.
Hey, good call on the Mercykiller = "multiclass-only" suggestion! I was wondering when we were going to start seeing that!

This is now officially what I think the Mercykiller playtest will be about.
 


I hope WOTC is smart enough to do some damage control when they release the druid playtest.

Here's the public relations problem for them. Basically, gamers online are a bunch of obnoxious spazzes.

My money is on this- the 3e druid had three shticks. It was the nature based spellcaster, and the pet owning class, and the shapeshifting combat class.

My educated guess is that each of these shticks will have been given to only one class. The Warden and Shaman will have eaten one shtick each, or, the Ranger will have eaten the pet shtick, and the Warden and Shaman will each take something else. And while there may be minor sharing of shticks, each class will focus solely on one.

This means that we're probably going to see the release of either a Druid who casts a lot of nature magic but barely shapeshifts, or, a Druid who shapeshifts all the time but casts barely any nature magic.

The internetters are going to lose their flippin' minds. Heck, even if they released the Druid, the Warden, and the Shaman all at once, they'd STILL lose their minds. Look at how many people absolutely cannot handle that the Fighter isn't an archer anymore, even though they know that the Ranger has all those powers ready and available for use.

I desparately hope that, alongside the Druid playtest, they release some sort of notice, some sort of comment, to defuse some of the coming rage. Something to let everyone know that just because an ability they liked isn't part of the Druid class anymore, it isn't necessarily gone.

Otherwise, I'm afraid that every thread discussing the Druid for the next few months will, after about the 2nd page, turn into a back and forth: "The druid doesn't even shapeshift now! Its ruined!" "But maybe the Shaman or the Warden shapeshifts." "But the druid doesn't even shapeshift now! Its ruined!" Etc.
 

This means that we're probably going to see the release of either a Druid who casts a lot of nature magic but barely shapeshifts, or, a Druid who shapeshifts all the time but casts barely any nature magic.

Does it actually matter? Considering the rather limited scope of powers in 4E, does it matter if the damage + effect comes from attacking with a shapeshifted body part or from a nature spell?
 

Cadfan, I think it's very hard to stop die-hard people from arguing on the internet. I mean, see: Golden Wyvern Adept. Heck, there are people still kvitching about this or that. I doubt WotC can stop the inevitable.
 

Yes! Two class playtest articles, one of my favorite class and the other brand new! I picked the best time to subscribe, this is utterly fantastic. Kudos on a great schedule, Wizards.

*Checks calendar* It's still November 21st... that's much too early. *pokes it, trying to make it december already*

EDIT: Hoping for the more shape-shifty build, if available. But I'm not going to say no to the druid!

EDIT2: And those are just the class playtests! Looking forward to the AV2 items and finding out how Sigil's factions will be playable. I forsee Shemeska's disappointment, unfortunately.
 
Last edited:

Cadfan, I think it's very hard to stop die-hard people from arguing on the internet. I mean, see: Golden Wyvern Adept. Heck, there are people still kvitching about this or that. I doubt WotC can stop the inevitable.
lol "Man do those deleted class features ever tick me off! Why couldn't they have named it something better before they decided to remove it? :rant:"

Yeah, folks will still fight about Druids getting chopped into three classes, just like they're still fighting about Elves getting chopped into two races. Guess what, folks? Druids need it. The last thing we need is for CoDzilla to terrorize its way into 4E.
 


Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top