Diplomatic Immunity OOC: The Third

This isn't making any sense? Why in the world would your misinterpretation be a factor to make a difference as to whether they bonded or change whether Kalli leaves the room? Just as you claim that you don't see where I'm coming from, I can't see your position here at all. In fact, to me it seems like you are just getting upset and trying to derail things (I'm not at all saying that this is what you are actually doing--it's just what it looks like). It is borderline mind-numbing how you claim that it is 'impossible' to come up with a post that is analagous to the one that you yourself already made there until you got rid of it. The circumstances haven't changed in any way that matters.

If you really want to see what someone who is trying to be helpful about changing something after he made some false-start assumptions that led to a result that didn't seem natural, check out what unleashed did in the SoM thread just the other day (assuming he kept the original to show you). He actually managed to change what his character posted without derailing the thread, forcing deletions, or slowing thigns down--in fact, he carefully rewrote all of his posts so that I didn't have to change one thing in mine, while still fixing the problem.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I will be helpful to a point but I will do something my character wouldn’t do… and I bet that's the major difference between what Unleashed did and here. Only the character's actions/decisions matter in. (IMHO)

If that is what you want, which is number 3 BTW, than write the post and I will drop it in the correct place for you...

What's your choice, RA? (Wow, I would have thought letting you chose would keep me from being accused of trying to derail something but I guess not... :( )
 

Brother Shatterstone said:
I will be helpful to a point but I will do something my character wouldn’t do… and I bet that's the major difference between what Unleashed did and here. Only the character's actions/decisions matter in. (IMHO)

If that is what you want, which is number 3 BTW, than write the post and I will drop it in the correct place for you...

What's your choice, RA? (Wow, I would have thought letting you chose would keep me from being accused of trying to derail something but I guess not... :( )
I choose to have you write back in something analagous enough to what you had before that we can just go with what is already there in my next post. Unfortunately, that wasn't one of your choices. I'm doing work right now (posting while I'm running my models, which takes a few minutes each time), so I don't have time to write it up for you, and you had one that worked beautifully up before until you got rid of it.
 



Glad to here it. :D Next question for you: What is Melody admitting or not admitting too in DT? (basically, yes she did it or no she didn't.)

Sorry... Head Cold and Dayquil bad combo on thought process....
 

Brother Shatterstone said:
I will be helpful to a point but I will do something my character wouldn’t do… and I bet that's the major difference between what Unleashed did and here. Only the character's actions/decisions matter in. (IMHO)
Just a note here. I reciently had one of my characters accidently slaughter several surenduring cultists, mostly because I missed the fact that combat had finished. After talking with the GM, we let it stand, he said he wouldn't penalize me in game for it, and I roleplayed it into the character as him being over come by rage, which given the situation (Assulting a cult of child stealing and soul stealing people can be kind of nerve wracking), it ended up working.

That said, doing something occasionaly out of character, even by mistake, is sometimes part of what makes the character whole. Occasionaly we all do something a bit different, sometimes by accident, sometimes with no problems. Sometimes it's best to simply let things lie, or make as few changes as possable.

Granted, I haven't read any of what you guys are talking about in the IC thread, but I've rarely seen anything that couldn't be resolved with anything more major than a post edit or two, otherwise maybe you just need to live with it. People aren't perfect, nor always 'in character', and neither should a PC be.
 

RA: [sblock] conformation... in post 76 Auto now seems to be suggesting he is hiding because he is attracted to her? (and sort of admitting it) Is this correct...? [/sblock]
 

Brother Shatterstone said:
Glad to here it. :D Next question for you: What is Melody admitting or not admitting too in DT? (basically, yes she did it or no she didn't.)

Sorry... Head Cold and Dayquil bad combo on thought process....
She said that she definitely didn't do it, I believe, when she says "No to both"
 


Remove ads

Top