Oh, no, we don't. We can continue to pretend that it never happened. In any case, nothing that occurred in those miserable threads provided evidence that the lichwyrm threat was real. Only one shard was ever sighted, and who's to say that it really was one of theAnyway as it stands the MA was unsuccessful and this being a "living world" we have to figure out the efffects of those failed adventures on the world.
I think a large number of LEW members would cry if they saw the MA revived, due to the previous debacle. Granted, I was arriving during the late aftermath...
PFRPG does have an Open SRD (which is an LEW requirement), but we'd have to make sure its compatible with what we already have and that enough of the player-base wants to switch. Depends on how knowledgeable the judges/DMs/Players are on it.By a change I was thinking of a 3.5/Pathfinder hybrid system.
No skin of my back; just posting my thoughts. I don't have a pony in this game much.Can I be blunt here on this topic? I mean, all I feel like saing is this: just leave it.
Doesn't bother me, though I think you meant "more power to you", not "poser".I hope I don't get banned for speaking too bluntly, but I feel I was a complete gentleman.
Doesn't bother me, though I think you meant "more power to you", not "poser".![]()
That is the second time I have heard that the problem lies in a DM shortage. Could that be in relation to 3.5 being "played out"
I mean would a change in the LEW rules themselves would that attract DMs also I read the proposal rules they seemed daunting to me as a newbie to pbp though everything was dauntinhg then
By a change I was thinking of a 3.5/Pathfinder hybrid system.
HM

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.