reveal
Adventurer
So we're in our weekly session of D20 Modern and I am DM. A character has three enemies around him. On his turn, he readies an action that if "I'm hit by anyone around me" he will attack them first. I put that part in quotes because that is exactly what he said.
Now, the enemies turn comes and they attack. He proceeds to start his readied action to attack them. I tell him he can't because he said that he would attack if they "hit" him not just if they attacked him. He told me I was being too literal and I explained I didn't want to try to interpret what my players wanted because I didn't want to get it wrong and have them be angry with me when they thought they were being screwed over. He disagreed but abided by my ruling and the session went on happily.
My question is, do y'all think I did the right thing? How would you have handled it?
Now, the enemies turn comes and they attack. He proceeds to start his readied action to attack them. I tell him he can't because he said that he would attack if they "hit" him not just if they attacked him. He told me I was being too literal and I explained I didn't want to try to interpret what my players wanted because I didn't want to get it wrong and have them be angry with me when they thought they were being screwed over. He disagreed but abided by my ruling and the session went on happily.

My question is, do y'all think I did the right thing? How would you have handled it?
Last edited: