DMG2 Riding Boots, prereq feats, and the CW Cavalier PrC

[Kershek]

If you are building up to this PrC then why do you not have the feats to begin with....

The boots allow Ride-By attack.....IF you have spirited charge then you get an additional bonus.

I like items such as these... gives use of a feat. If you have the feat tree then you get an extra bonus....cool

I spent the other feats on other things: Celestial Bloodline (he's an Aasimar), Pious Soul, and Leadership (since we're a party of 3 and without a cleric).

 

[Infiniti2000]

*snort*

*chuckle*

*guffaw*

Sorry - I couldn't help myself.

Easy, there, I almost choked on my soup.

 

[Artoomis]

*snort*

*chuckle*

*guffaw*

Sorry - I couldn't help myself.

This is not the same thing as saying you effectively have the feat. That's an entirely different matter.

 

[Artoomis]

I spent the other feats on other things: Celestial Bloodline (he's an Aasimar), Pious Soul, and Leadership (since we're a party of 3 and without a cleric).

Hard luck then, eh? No Cavalier for you. At least not yet... perhaps later, and into epic levels.

 

[Eloi]

A Paladin *could* skip this feat.. but it would be incredibly dangerous to leave oneself open like this for long, and the Paladin would almost certainly earmark their next feat to "fill in the gap" in their training.

Does the character do other perilous things like not fill their waterjugs before leaving on a journey, go underground without bringing food, rope or a light source, wear plate mail on shipboard when at sea, flirt with Succubi, or put on unidentified rings and leap off of cliffs?

 

[Oates]

I spent the other feats on other things: Celestial Bloodline (he's an Aasimar), Pious Soul, and Leadership (since we're a party of 3 and without a cleric).

A pious soul cavalier....hmmm.... of course when I think of cavaliers, I think about the musketeers...<looks at well bosomed wench and says " how you dooin'>

 

[Lobo Lurker]

I got a feeling this Paladin will have athlete's foot

I don't see any reason why he'd want to take them off, really, unless they got destroyed.

Umm, maybe he wants to take a bath?

 

[Infiniti2000]

Umm, maybe he wants to take a bath?

He can't take a bath. There are no rules for taking a bath.

 

[boolean]

I got a feeling this Paladin will have athlete's foot

Unless that's covered by his immunity to disease?

 

[Borlon]

No, you don't have the feat. You have the effects of the feat, not the same thing.

The requirement is NOT that you be able to do all the thing in the Ride-By Attck feat, it's that you actually HAVE the ride-by attack feat.

But isn't it the case that one of the effects of a feat is qualifying for prerequisites that look for that feat?

Or is qualifying for a prerequisite not an effect?