I agree with DrNuncheon's position here. Better to employ some kind of universal holy warrior mechanic than try to universalize the paladin. There was a recent thread about paladins and sexuality that dealt pretty effectively with why Umbran and I are taking the position that we are regarding what kind of people paladins are. I don't especially want to rehash all the points made here but, for the Readers Digest condensed version, it goes like this:
Paladins are based on a particular idea of what it meant to be a holy warrior in Western Europe in the high medieval period (1050-1300). As such they are a problematic class if you take them out of this context. The paladin isn't really built as a generic holy warrior; if someone has done that task, better to use what they have built than try to stretch or squish the paladin into something it really isn't.
Paladins are based on a particular idea of what it meant to be a holy warrior in Western Europe in the high medieval period (1050-1300). As such they are a problematic class if you take them out of this context. The paladin isn't really built as a generic holy warrior; if someone has done that task, better to use what they have built than try to stretch or squish the paladin into something it really isn't.