Rel
Liquid Awesome
We had a sudden realization at our game the other night and although it isn't really earthshattering in consequence, it sparked this question: Do arcane spellcasters in most campaigns use the Burning Hands spell.
My reason for asking is this: If you are using the spell with any degree of efficiency, you will be subject to one or more Attacks of Opportunity every time you use it.
This could be a problem with any of the cone spells, but they (by definition) get wider as they get further from the caster.
Because of the shape of Burning Hands (a semi-circle with the caster at the center point) the only way to avoid taking AoO's is by only catching one creature (assuming a Medium Sized creature) in the square 10 feet away from the caster. That isn't a very efficient use of the spell.
It seems like this should have occured to us sooner, but in the last campaign where Burning Hands was cast, it was done with a wand and therefore didn't provoke AoO's anyway.
Any thoughts?
My reason for asking is this: If you are using the spell with any degree of efficiency, you will be subject to one or more Attacks of Opportunity every time you use it.
This could be a problem with any of the cone spells, but they (by definition) get wider as they get further from the caster.
Because of the shape of Burning Hands (a semi-circle with the caster at the center point) the only way to avoid taking AoO's is by only catching one creature (assuming a Medium Sized creature) in the square 10 feet away from the caster. That isn't a very efficient use of the spell.
It seems like this should have occured to us sooner, but in the last campaign where Burning Hands was cast, it was done with a wand and therefore didn't provoke AoO's anyway.
Any thoughts?