Wombat
First Post
My feeling is, if it was good enough for Shakespeare, it's good enough for me.
Cross-gender play is certainly accepted. As GM I have to play out males, females, and non-humans. No one says that all the NPCs in my game should be male (indeed, there are many counts against that!). Should I put in a restriction saying only elves may play elves? Probably wouldn't fly, and yet that is probably even a greater leap in the ability to play a role convincingly (how does a non-human individual actually think and act?).
Are there differences between the ways in which men and women, in the aggregate, think and act? Yes. Are these differences overdrawn? Definitely. Do I think everyone can sucessfully bridge the gap and play the other gender convincingly? Nope. OTOH, I don't think most of us tabletopping geeks play brawny-non-scholarly types very convincingly either.
So in the end it is a wash.
Play what you feel, as long as you are having fun and not utterly disrupting the game.
Cross-gender play is certainly accepted. As GM I have to play out males, females, and non-humans. No one says that all the NPCs in my game should be male (indeed, there are many counts against that!). Should I put in a restriction saying only elves may play elves? Probably wouldn't fly, and yet that is probably even a greater leap in the ability to play a role convincingly (how does a non-human individual actually think and act?).
Are there differences between the ways in which men and women, in the aggregate, think and act? Yes. Are these differences overdrawn? Definitely. Do I think everyone can sucessfully bridge the gap and play the other gender convincingly? Nope. OTOH, I don't think most of us tabletopping geeks play brawny-non-scholarly types very convincingly either.
So in the end it is a wash.
Play what you feel, as long as you are having fun and not utterly disrupting the game.
