L
lowkey13
Guest
*Deleted by user*
Please add a fourth option
- Yes, but only if it sets out to raise or at least meet the bar set by the golden standard - the 3rd Edition FRCS
Because if "yes" would only give me a light-weight something on the level of the SCAG Realms overview, then my answer would be "no, let's hold off until D&D has a new management team".
Absolutely. I don't understand why WotC is pushing APs when the majority of gamers want something else.
I found the Sundering book series did a good job laying the groundwork for the changes. The only country that was ????? was Sembia. I could see them rising as the new dark merchant power in the region. Otherwise I thought The Sword Coast Adventure Guide did a good job for updates with the Sword Coast.The biggest problem is the lack of information outside of the Sword Coast. Geographical information can be found in earlier guides, since most changes from 4E were undone, but there is almost nothing about the current political setup and potential adventuring areas (both of which a guide will provide). Additionally, the Realms went from having a glut of interesting/useful NPCs to a blank slate.
While some approve of this setup, since it allows the DM to make up whatever they want, others find this a lot of tedious work. If they wanted to do that much work, they could just design their own setting.
Please add a fourth option
- Yes, but only if it sets out to raise or at least meet the bar set by the golden standard - the 3rd Edition FRCS
Because if "yes" would only give me a light-weight something on the level of the SCAG Realms overview, then my answer would be "no, let's hold off until D&D has a new management team".
I love campaign settings... but I have three copies of that one already.
They just need to publish a PDF updating existing ones, bundled with Print on Demand versions of the 2e or 3e versions of the settings.
Really, for the Realms, once you've read one version of the setting and absorbed the basic details, FR Wiki is much, much more useful