Do you want Tieflings in the phb?

[mhensley]

I've seen a lot of speculation that Tieflings will become a core race in 4e. I have nothing against them, but having them as a core race seems kind of out of place when they have never been anything but a very minor race (if included at all) in any setting I've used. Do you want Tieflings in the phb?

 

[Horacio]

As a Planescape fan, I can only say "Yes!"

 

[Bavix]

No Tieflings

Hell no!

 

[mhacdebhandia]

Yes, I think it's a great move - and not just because I'm a Planescape fan. I like what it implies about the importance of fiends to the "core feel" of Fourth Edition.

 

[Szatany]

Depends on the alternative. If I'd have to choose between tieflings and half-orcs or gnomes, then definitely tieflings. If between them and drow, I'd gladly pick the drow.

 

[Jer]

Where's the response for "Don't Care"?

Seriously - as long as there are rules for humans in the core, I don't really care what other races they put in there. They could have the Flumph as a core PC race and it wouldn't bother me ... much. Other than trying to figure out how a Flumph fighter is going to wear plate armor, I suppose.

 

[The_Gunslinger658]

Hi-

I said no because there is no Half-Celestial to counter-balance the Tiefling, include the Half-Celestial and then I will vote yes.


Scott

 

[crazy_cat]

Yes.

If having Tieflings in the PHB is the price we have to pay to lose Gnomes - then I'm all for it.

 

[Baby Samurai]

Like all races, it depends on the campaign. In my current Planescape campaign, of course I want tieflings; one of the main antagonists is a tiefling incarnate.

If I'm running a Dragonlance campaign, then not particularly.

 

[Thornir Alekeg]

What the heck is a Tiefling, anyway? I've never actually used or read about the race. I'm curious as to why people would feel strongly about it being a core race, one way or the other.